Charles signed the Petition, as the only means of securing
parliamentary consent to taxation; but he had no intention of observing it. For
the next eleven years he managed to govern without calling Parliament in
session. The conduct of affairs during this period lay largely in the hands of
Sir Thomas Wentworth, afterwards earl of Strafford, and William Laud, who later
became archbishop of Canterbury. The king made these two men his principal
advisers and through them carried on his despotic rule. Arbitrary courts, which
tried cases without a jury, punished those who resisted the royal will. A rigid
censorship of the press prevented any expression of popular discontent. Public
meetings were suppressed as seditious riots. Even private gatherings were
dangerous, for the king had swarms of spies to report any disloyal acts or
utterances.
JOHN HAMPDEN AND "SHIP-MONEY"
Since Charles ruled without a Parliament, he had to adopt
all sorts of devices to fill his treasury. One of these was the levying of
"ship- money." According to an old custom, seaboard towns and
counties had been required to provide ships or money for the royal navy.
Charles revived this custom and extended it to towns and counties lying inland.
It seemed clear that the king meant to impose a permanent tax on all England
without the assent of Parliament. The demand for "ship-money" aroused
much opposition, and John Hampden, a wealthy squire of Buckinghamshire, refused
to pay the twenty shillings levied on his estate. Hampden was tried before a
court of the royal judges and was convicted by a bare majority. He became,
however, the hero of the hour. The England people recognized in him one who had
dared, for the sake of principle, to protest against the king's despotic rule.